Conscious Robots
Theory
The only aim of our lives –
of every choice and action we take –
– is to convince our own brains
to make us feel good.
The problem is,
our brains haven’t been programmed
to make us feel good
– they’ve been programmed
to maximise the survival chances of our genes.
Conscious Robots Theory
is an attempt to understand
the implications of this for our daily lives
and to work out what it means for our future.
The Most Important Thing
About Being Human:
# 1 - Humans are Robots
Not robots made of steel, obvs, but rather biological machines, programmed by evolution to maximise the survival chances of our genes. Think "chess computer" - you get to choose your day-to-day moves, but not your overall goal.
"Free Will" is an illusion, just like "Flat Earth" is an illusion: the only evidence that free will exists is your personal experience.
And once you see how the illusion works, you'll wonder why you were fooled for so long.
Learn how "Free Will" is a logical and scientific impossibility. See how your personal experience fools you into thinking you have free will, when you're really just carrying out genetic instructions programmed into your brain by millions of years of evolution.
The Most Important Thing
About Being Human:
# 2 - Happiness doesn't work the way we think it does
Happiness isn't the reward for a life well-lived, it's the mechanism used to control our conscious choices. We spend our lives trying to change the world around us because we think it will make a lasting change to how happy we are. But Happiness Doesn't Work That Way - regardless of how much we achieve in life, our brain quickly resets us to "Yeah, not bad, thanks." - that feeling that we've had every day of our lives of "If only" - "If only this thing could be improved, if only I could solve this problem, if only I had this much more money... life would be perfect."
Yeah, right. Like that's ever happened.
Happiness is a never-ending treadmill, resetting quickly to "Yeah, not bad, thanks" regardless of what we achieve in life. It's why we're no happier than our ancestors who had none of the things we now see as essential for a happy life - like smartphones, warm houses, shoes and fresh avocados at just the right level of ripeness.
We experience the "Pleasure Fader"
and the "Expectation Adjuster" every day - and yet we don't realise these are the mechanisms used by our genes to enslave us.
Learn why trying to increase our "overall happiness levels" by trying to control the world around us is like nailing jelly to the ceiling.
"Happy days tbh" - Elon Musk reflecting on being so hard up he had to shower at the YMCA
The Most Important Thing
About Being Human:
# 3 - The Bug in the Programming of the Conscious Mind
The inevitable future of humanity
is that we learn to exploit...
The Bug in the Programming
of Our Conscious Minds.
Just like every other living thing, we humans have evolved to maximise the survival chances of our genes - we know this must be true because it's the only purpose that evolution by natural selection can create in any living thing.
However, when the conscious mind evolved, natural selection wrote a bug into the programming (by some glorious, lucky mutation). Rather than programming our conscious minds to "maximise the survival chances of our genes", our conscious minds were programmed with "feelings" - (basically pain and pleasure with a few added nuances).
And the result of this happy fate was that our conscious purpose became "to maximise how good we feel".
Now, here's the thing... because "how good we feel" appears to be so closely linked to "what goes on in the world around us", we tend to assume that "how good we feel" is actually determined and controlled by "what goes on in the world around us".
But it isn't.
That's another illusion.
"How good we feel" is actually entirely controlled by our non-conscious minds.
Our non-conscious minds (the part of our brains that we have no control over) reward us or punish us by making us feel good or bad: we get "little dog-biscuits of pleasure" if the survival chances of our genes increase, and we get "little chastisements of pain" if the survival chances of our genes decrease.
So, here's the thing (part 2):
This short-cut in the programming of the conscious mind presents us with a huge opportunity. It means we can (finally) achieve the only thing we want in life. We don't actually need to control anything in the world around us - we don't actually need to improve the survival chances of our genes at all.
Instead, all we have to do is to take direct conscious control of the feelings we experience all day.
And when we do that (which is our inevitable future, because there's no free will), we will finally achieve what humans have been chasing since we climbed down from the trees. The thing that Genghis Khan, Tutankhamun, George Washington, Winston Churchill, Nelson Mandela, Bill Gates and Elon Musk never achieved...
Heaven on Earth.
It won't be Free Will, but it will be what we'd do with Free Will if we really had it.
Aims - long form of the fundamental arguments - essentially "the book". Do videos of these.
publicise with "shorts/ toks"
comment on real-world/news issues eg openai's overall charter aim or why elon wants to go to mars - some of these topics are listed below but i have maybe 50 of them.
publicise with interviews with others to get their arguments and answer them. we can initially pay minor-level bloggers. hopefully this then gets invites to higher level bloggers.
ppc if we can get some great videos
How I feel isn't the only thing I care about.
How our choices are controlled
Why we must be robots
How we know we aren't living in a simulation.
How the illusion works
- why we're so convinced we're "doing what we like with our lives" when in reality we're just following instructions.
But God gave me free will!
Everything is status.
Why the urgency? (because China and ai)
The "Pleasure Fader"
The "Expectation Adjuster"
Learn why trying to increase our "overall happiness levels" by trying to control the world around us is like nailing jelly to the ceiling.
The Bug in the Programming of the Conscious Mind
The inevitable future of humanity
is that we learn to exploit...
The Bug in the Programming
of Our Conscious Minds.
Just like every other living thing, we humans have evolved to maximise the survival chances of our genes - we know this must be true because it's the only purpose that evolution by natural selection can create in any living thing.
However, when the conscious mind evolved, natural selection wrote a bug into the programming (by some glorious, lucky mutation). Rather than programming our conscious minds to "maximise the survival chances of our genes", our conscious minds were programmed with "feelings" - (basically pain and pleasure with a few added nuances).
And the result of this happy fate was that our conscious purpose became "to maximise how good we feel".
Now, here's the thing... because "how good we feel" appears to be so closely linked to "what goes on in the world around us", we tend to assume that "how good we feel" is actually determined and controlled by "what goes on in the world around us".
But it isn't.
That's another illusion.
"How good we feel" is actually entirely controlled by our non-conscious minds.
Our non-conscious minds (the part of our brains that we have no control over) reward us or punish us by making us feel good or bad: we get "little dog-biscuits of pleasure" if the survival chances of our genes increase, and we get "little chastisements of pain" if the survival chances of our genes decrease.
So, here's the thing (part 2):
This short-cut in the programming of the conscious mind presents us with a huge opportunity. It means we can (finally) achieve the only thing we want in life. We don't actually need to control anything in the world around us - we don't actually need to improve the survival chances of our genes at all.
Instead, all we have to do is to take direct conscious control of the feelings we experience all day.
And when we do that (which is our inevitable future, because there's no free will), we will finally achieve what humans have been chasing since we climbed down from the trees. The thing that Genghis Khan, Tutankhamun, George Washington, Winston Churchill, Nelson Mandela, Bill Gates and Elon Musk never achieved...
Heaven on Earth.
It won't be Free Will, but it will be what we'd do with Free Will if we really had it.
Life is inherently unsatisfactory
- Buddha
Life is inherently satisfactory
- Conscious Robots Theory
How we live our lives...
We live our lives on the assumption that, if we can overcome various challenges in the world around us, we’ll be rewarded with happiness, contentment and satisfaction. If we have nice house, a great relationship, well-adjusted kids and a couple of good vacations a year, we’ll live “happily ever after”.
The reality...
The reality is that “how we feel” is entirely determined by an algorithm running in the non-conscious part of our minds – the part of our brains over which we have no conscious control.
The Happiness Alogorithm
The happiness algorithm is programmed by millions of years of evolution to maximise the survival chances of our genes – if the survival chances of our genes improves, the algorithm makes us feel “good”, if the survival chances of our genes falls we feel “bad” – pain, anguish, sorrow, anxiety and fear.
"Meaning of Life"
(human being)
= maximise survival chances of genes.
Attempting to “maximise the survival chances of your genes” is the only thing that any evolved lifeform can do – whether it’s a tree, a slug or Nelson Mandela. If you believe in evolution, this is what you believe. More here.
"Meaning of Life"
(conscious mind) = maximise how good it feels.
“You” are your conscious mind. Your conscious experience is your only experience.
But your conscoius mind isn’t programmed to attempt to maximise the survival chances of your genes. Your conscious mind is programmed to maximise how good it feels. And nothing else. More here
Darwin and Dawkins didn’t say this.
This is something you can only learn from your own experience of life. Discussed here.
“How good you feel” is entirely determined by a part of your mind that you are not conscious of. More here.
Thus the entire meaning and purpose of any human, whether we are Genghis Khan or Mahatma Ghandi, is to convince our own brains to let us feel good.
Meditation - can it work?
Meditation attempts to gain conscious control over the non-conscoius mind - and thus to control feelings directly. Does it work? If it did, you wouldn't hear about it: the meditatiors would be too busy meditating to bother telling you about it. When a meditator tells you "meditation is great", the meditator is attempting to fool their own brains into making them feel good - by raising the status of the meditator. But why would they need to do that if they had a direct route to "feeling good"? We're suspicious.
Why is this beautiful?
Entirely because your mind thinks it is. It's just light waves entering your eye. Why does your mind think it's beautiful? Because natural selection. It's a fertile landscape: lots of food and water. You can see a long way - which means you have good warning of prey, of being attacked. To face the reality of being human, it helps to get the right perspective on "why" you feel the way you do about stuff.
Happiness, Eudamonia, Well-being... what the?
You can use whatever word you like. It's not complicated. Fancy words are not needed, but if they make you feel good - that's great!. That's the whole point.
What we're talking about is "what you want" and you know what you want because of how it makes you feel. If it makes you feel good - you want it. If it makes you feel bad - you don't want it. That's free will! (just kidding).
The Meaning of Life
Elon Musk wants to fly to Mars. It's a long way to go, just to convince his own mind to let him feel good...
The aim and purpose of every human that's ever lived - from Einstein to Churchill - is to convince their own brains to allow them to feel good.
How on Earth has Elon missed this? we have no idea. It's not exactly rocket science. If only he had a company that did brain rewiring. Oooh... Hold on. Maybe the Mars thing is just a misdirection... nice.
Money doesn't make you happier
Anyone with money will tell you that. (Unless they're trying to sell you their "get rich with crypto" scheme. (because they aren't happy with all the money they already have (and they're hoping you won't notice that little contradiction))).
CRT tells you why money doesn't make you happier.
And it's not some vague "oh, because the really important things in life are family and helping other people" - because family and helping other people doesn't make you happy either. Having a great family makes you happy about "family" - but your brain compensates by making you less happy about something else - like your career, maybe, or your waistline. Having money makes you happy about having money. So you just start feeling bad about something else instead.
Turtles all the way down
We need to talk about evolution.
Because evolution didn't just create us and then leave us alone to "get on with it". Like, 10,000 years ago. And then we used our "free will" to invent agriculture, nail polish and Netflix.
No way. Not possible. Evolution still controls everything we do. 100%.
We know this because nothing else can be created... other than by genetic changes.
But can't we choose? Can't we choose what we do with our lives?
We are chess computers. We can choose the moves we make to achieve the objective(s) we have been given (although even those choices are just a part of the automatic cascade of chemical reactions that began with the big bang).
But we can't choose our own objectives. Because on what values would we choose new objectives?
It's turtles all the way down. And the turtle at the bottom? He's standing on the (apparent) randomness of genetic change, almost all of which has been selected by "natural selection".
Religion and The Bug
Religion exploits The Bug in the Programming of the Conscious Mind. As does self-onanism. SO can't be maladaptive - it can't be better than the real thing. Well, it could be - provided there's another urge that goes "hand in hand" with SO. How to think about evoution - using SO. Religion - might be adaptive. Can it be neutral - it's hard to think how it could be neutral, given that it's so powerful. Lots of theories that religion is adaptive 1) because it makes you feel better - this is probably a silly idea 2) because it makes the society more cohesive because there's an all-seeing eye-in-the-sky 3) Dunbar keen on trance - but not sure how the old girls at my local church have been getting into trance.
How to think about evolution - using SO
SO - is it adaptive, maladaptive or a spandrel? That's the first point when you're thinking about evolution - it has to be one of them. cf religion.
Maladaptive - it's hard to see how something very prevalent can be maladaptive, unless it actually has only a small impact on the life of the individual. SO could be a real problem - it's cheap, it's convenient, it doesn't require investment in offspring. But it doesn't seem to be a problem. So is there a secondary urge - beyond the "relief from the building pressure"? There does seem to be a strong secondary urge. (we could compare with homosexuality). Is it adaptive? It could be - it could control the urge of a male without a female eg when hunting, when at war, when simply a beta in the tribe.
Space to think...
this space!
5 reasons free will is impossible.
hwat would it gtake to get happie r- moving the happiness around by solving one problem.
expectation adjuster
pleasure fader
look for more keywords in notes
Evolution is everything.
There is no human behaviour that wasn’t chosen by natural selection.
Which seems bizarre. How could natural selection have known about mobile phones and fast food?
Simply because there is no other mechanism of “behaviour creation”.
No other way that our likes and desires could be “programmed”.
“Culture” can’t program us, because we can only be programmed to want things that we already want.
We can’t choose things for ourselves, because we need pre-existing likes and desires to know what “new thing” to like and desire.
Do some of us suffer more than others?
Communicating our happiness levels is an important part of the survival strategy of any human.
If we are strong, we want to prove our value to the rest of the tribe – either as a leader or as a valuable supporter. We must, therefore, communicate that we are happy – that we have sufficient ability to provide for ourselves a pleasant and enjoyable life. “I don’t need you, fellow tribe member, but I am strong enough to add to the tribe – provided you respect me and treat me well in return.”
If we are weak and struggling, we need support. We need sympathy. We need to say “I’m struggling now – I need you to feel my pain. But I will support you once you have supported me”. A beggar on the street cannot be too cheerful. He must be just the right amount of “I’m gritting my teeth and getting through this, and with just that little bit more support from you, I’ll be a right there for you, covering your back.”
And finally there is the author of the “I suffered in childhood because of abuse and/or mental illness, but now I am strong – and the fact that I overcame all that pain and difficulty means I’m worth even more to the tribe than if I’d been born with a silver spoon”.
Bottom line – you can never trust anyone else’s report of how happy or unhappy they are or were.
Just like you won’t be able to trust the robot when it tells you it is or isn’t conscious.